Part 3:
So, Jencyn, the nursing major visited the Sculpture Studio and was invited to make something. That positive experience snowballed into a second, more involved, sculptural experience. At the end of the second day, Jencyn wrote: “While I am fully knowledgeable on the stress shared in that studio as deadlines approach and art show submissions loom, it was an escape for me, and I was, and am, really grateful I got the chance to be a sculpture student for a day or two with my best friend and her friends and her teacher who was more than willing to teach me, a random girl who is not supposed to be there, how to weld."
I have known for several years that students have a different experience in my classes than they may have in other classes. I have largely shrugged this off in the past or just chalked it up to the Sculpture Studio just being a fun place. I honestly thought that it was just easier for students to have a positive experience in Sculpture because the nature of the processes are so much fun. It wasn’t until I spoke with some other professors and teachers that I realized not every Sculpture Studio is like ours. It made me a little more curious about what those differences were. "The unexamined life..." and all, right? Jencyn's experience was a perfect opportunity for me to engage with those thoughts. If you're not a teacher, I won't judge you if you skip the multitude of words to follow.
Obviously we were engaging with experiential learning. That’s almost always a given in my Sculpture classes that are heavily based on action and doing. Art students at this level often learn best when they get their hands on the materials and get to actively participate in the processes. However, each professor handles this differently. My approach is to introduce the tools and processes in a way that is not overwhelming or information overload. For each new material/project, I’ll introduce and demonstrate the tools and equipment students will need for that material/project. A little bit of general information to keep people safe, followed by more specific information distributed as they have more experiences.
I also learned that my approach to those introductions is different from other approaches. Talking about it is boring and ineffective for tactile learners. At the end of the day, no one cares about WHY the MIG welder works or what kind of compressed gas it uses. They need to know what it feels like to hold a welding gun in their hands while sparks fly all over them as they try to move very slowly the distance of one quarter of an inch. That is very much a “learn by doing” experience.
With Jencyn, I did very little explaining, zero lecturing and just let her feel her way through both of these experiences. She may have, at times, felt like she was a lone explorer, but everything she did was closely monitored, highly considered and completely safe. She was able to feel like she was walking a tightrope alone, but she had a very secure safety net if she needed it. I love the perceived sense of adventure and danger that comes with sculpture, but so much of it is really just perception. In reality, my sculpture worker and I are very closely monitoring each student for safety and progress.
This idea of academic adventure is important. My current generation of students mostly came from K-12 environments where they were told exactly what to do. Meeting expectations was treated as excellence by many. Current college students love to be told exactly what is required of them so that they can check boxes. My projects, by design, force students to think for themselves. I intentionally provide limited amounts of information so that students can’t just follow a script. In order to solve the problems of each project, they must think analytically and critically. This makes many students very uncomfortable because they do not know the outcome before they start. That is what makes each project a worthwhile creative endeavor. This is when students start using a larger percentage of their brains.
Jencyn had no idea what to expect with either of these experiences. Because I was moving around so much between students on the first day, she must have felt like a solo adventurer, and in a way, she was. I’m sure it was a relief to have Elena and Cathryn nearby to help in my absence, but she was basically making the foam heart on her own. While that may have been scary at times, it also increased the feeling of accomplishment when the project was complete. To know you created something great and you did it all by yourself is a great feeling.
Students in my classes are almost never shown previous examples of student work. Inevitably, they’ll see work on display on campus and my projects have grown a bit of a lore about them over the years. I learned many years ago, that if I show an example of a past student’s project, every new student will see that project as the goal and I’ll get a whole class of projects that solve the problems exactly the same way. There’s nothing creative about that. When I don't show examples, suddenly there are a multitude of correct ways to go about solving problems and the results get far more creative and interesting.
There’s a downside to not showing examples. I have to do a lot more explaining and often, I have to take students by the figurative hand and lead them through the more difficult parts of a project. This extra work on my part is worth it if it helps to produce students who are always looking for the most creative solution. I have a long drive home where I can ride in silence if I need a break from hearing my name a thousand times. I'm kinda not kidding.
Jencyn was in uncharted territory. She had almost no visual touchstones to rely on. She had the freedom to make whatever she wanted in both instances and while that freedom may have created an amount of discomfort, it also gave her permission to make and draw anything that made her happy. She had no idea that the steel heart shaped glasses would be a level of difficulty that was far beyond her current capabilities because she hadn't seen anyone try it and fail. She simply had the freedom to say that’s what she wanted to create.
Academic scaffolding was in place to help her and to protect her, but she likely had no idea. Students don’t need to be aware of all that a teacher is doing to create a safe and effective learning environment. I often seem as if I’m operating without a plan. While this is far from true, it does create a fun, fly by the seat of your pants feeling for students. This creates an air of excitement, as if anything could happen. Sure, there are times when I have no idea if something will work out, but most often, I have a lot of experience and knowledge to guide me. Students don’t need to know that. Everyone loves an adventure. Let them have some fun!
Which brings us to the idea of impossibility. Over the years, I’ve had many students bring sketches of ideas to me that I have a pretty high level of confidence knowing they are not currently capable of creating. I know things about the materials and processes that they do not know. I can look two or three weeks into the future and anticipate the problems they’ll encounter. I’ll take what I know about each student and do some calculations and sometimes I’ll know there’s no way they’ll succeed. Very often, I’ll greenlight the idea anyway.
Why? I had this one student who could do anything she wanted. She was that type of person, smart, creative and driven. One day I told her that I wanted her to come up with an idea of a form she thought it would be impossible to create in her preferred method of making. She presented the idea and she was right, it looked impossible. I told her to try to make it. It took her several months, a few tears and a lot of cursing, but she did it and it remains one of the most impressive things I’ve ever seen a student create. By my calculations, it was impossible, yet she did it.
Was it academically irresponsible to greenlight that impossible idea? Not in the least. I understand exactly how much a student can learn from doing something impossible. Most often, it isn’t possible and the student will either figure that out and pivot to a better idea or solution, or they’ll learn the limitations of the process and they’ll develop an even better plan. They only way they fail is if they quit. Sometimes they do quit, but it’s rare. Sometimes, they don’t fail. If you don’t tell someone it’s impossible, they might just make it possible.
I have learned to praise the attempt and to encourage students through the tough parts. Most creative students love a good challenge. Some of my people absolutely thrive when they know I don’t think they can do something. I tend to create comedically oppositional relationships with students and they love to show me I was wrong. Don’t tell them that I love it too.
My hope is that all of these things help to create a feeling of “fun” in the studio. Fun is not an academic word, but I’ve recently learned that “play” is gaining respect in the academic world. The ability to approach a problem with a healthy sense of play is so important, especially in the Sculpture Studio. When you are free to play, there’s no risk. You’re not worried about grades and you know you have support nearby, so there’s more freedom to try things. Especially when you have a loud bald guy urging you to just do it and see what happens.
The freedom to play in the studio is crucial to my personal approach to teaching. I have intentionally created a controlled environment where students can feel welcomed and safe. When you feel welcome and safe, you can play. An environment where you’re encouraged to try a variety of possible approaches creates a situation where students can engage with their most creative thoughts. It creates an environment where students can have a very frustrating experience and they’ll still be excited to come tell me exactly what went wrong and what they’re going to do differently the next time.
Jencyn also saw firsthand just how supportive the Sculpture studio can be. The encouragement of a teacher can be powerful, but you know what’s even more powerful? The encouragement of your peers. From the moment Jencyn stepped into the studio, students welcomed her, saw that she was attempting to make things and they praised the attempt. Elena, Cathryn and Jenna all spent significant time with Jencyn and they encouraged like it was their job. Other students passing through smiled, said encouraging things and offered support. Gabe was working in the welding area with us and his constant smile and positive presence was a tangible comfort.
All of these teaching tactics, paired with my particular personality and teaching style, work together to create a learning environment where the tone has been set, the challenges have been laid out, the safety net is in place and the freedom to play has been encouraged. Of course, this doesn’t work all the time. Some students simply don’t jive with my personality or my academic approach. This bothers me far more than I’ll ever tell you, but I am learning that there’s not much I can do about it. My hope is that those students will find their way to another mentor and/or another creative discipline and find success. I’m not advocating for all studio professors and art teachers to adopt my methods. I am offering an explanation of them so that they can steal whatever works for them and their students and personalities.
So what did this accomplish? I’m not out here trying to convert the masses to be Art majors or even 3D BFAs. Students sometimes think that, but you have to consider this from my perspective. Teaching is hard when you have great students. Why would I want students who weren’t passionate about being there? My job is to teach, not to convert. The good news will spread itself. (I feel like there’s a religious application there, but no one has time for that, right?) Jencyn isn’t going to drop her Nursing major and become a sculptor. So what was the goal?
The goal was to point out the innate creativity she already had. I wanted to help her to see the abilities she has and to build confidence. I wanted her to see what was involved in the physical process of creating a three-dimensional form and to grow in her appreciation for art and art-making. If she never comes back to the studio, she will forever see 3D artwork differently. She will have a greater appreciation for what it takes to produce a form that simply did not exist an hour before. She will know how to break a large project down into smaller parts. She will understand the importance of developing a plan and the importance of hard work to make that plan a reality.
And maybe, if I’m lucky, she will always hold a place in her life for creativity. Maybe she will know that she can do things all by herself and that she never has to rely on a significant other to do things for her. Maybe she’ll wake up every day and remember that she’s a badass, because she is.
One final teacher thought: Jencyn’s studio success was not only because of the learning environment. Jencyn came into the studio as a smart, creative and disciplined student. More often than not, students like that will find success no matter how bad my teaching is.
I would still argue that a great student plus great teaching is an equation for even greater success.
Jencyn signed off on her sculpture experience with this: “I would offer for you guys to come and learn to manually take blood pressures or cry in a study room with me the night before a pharm exam but I don’t think that would be as fun.”
Well, I would bet there are days when my people would gladly trade places, but when they returned to their senses, hopefully they'd see that a creative and playful experience is worth tolerating me!




